![]() ![]() It’s all high-res, too! A feature I absolutely love is the airside road tunnel that goes under part of the terminal, near stand G4 - it’s incredibly well done! The apron itself features those wonderful reflective oil stains we’ve come to love about Flightbeam airports, and it hosts some really decent static clutter, custom-modelled specifically for this airport. There are no jagged curves in the taxiway and apron markings. Ground textures airside are simply fantastic and retain much of their detail when viewed from altitude. You can get inside but it’s a bit temperamental, and what’s to be seen isn’t particularly aesthetic once you’re in there. Some of the texturing is a little lower-res than I would have liked but it’s decent enough where it matters.ĭespite the marketing claims there’s no real interior to speak of - just a nice-looking vista from the cockpit of a parked airliner but that’s really all you need. ![]() So, does KMSP live up to the hype?įlightbeam have put the majority of their effort into making the terminal area look as realistic as possible and they’ve done a stellar job. ![]() They are certainly among the top five but the likes of IniBuilds and Pyreegue are, in my opinion, just as good and, in some respects, better. Justifiably, Flightbeam have always received enormous praise for their incredibly realistic-looking airports however at times I feel they’re somewhat overhyped. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |